![]() |
| Penfolds Magill Estate Shiraz 2004 |
Penfolds Magill Estate Shiraz 2004 (Adelaide, SA)
$75ish, Cork, 13.8%
Source: Cellar
www.penfolds.com
I quite like Magill Estate (the wine that is). It’s always (or at least over the last 15 years) been something of a moderate wine for Penfolds, built in a fashion that is actually quite restrained – all things considered. I mean, it’s oaky, that’s a given, and it has plenty of Penfolds® brand tannin in there, but it does taste like a wine from a place, which you’d be hard pressed to say that about anything else in the Penfolds range (unless that place is ‘South Australia’).
I doubly thought I’d like this wine too, simply because it’s a 2004 Penfolds ‘Icon & Luxury Range’ Shiraz, which means that it carries plenty of DNA from the positively sublime 2004 Penfolds Grange and 2004 St Henri, both of which I liked muchly.
Two big ticks then. And two big ticks turns into high fives with the wine itself. It’s a cracker. A humdinger. The shizzle. Whatever you call it, it’s real South Australian Shiraz, built proper like, but also built with care, set in a style that is really quite ‘medium’ (and all the better for it) though unmistakeably Penfoldian in it’s styling.
That stylin’ is obvious just by holding your glass up to the light. It looks Penfoldian. It looks like Shiraz with a capital S. Smells it too, with a nose that’s seen the inside of an American oak barrel and come out with the coconut sweetness to prove it. But it doesn’t smell oaky either. Just, well, Penfoldian. Regally, proudly Penfoldian. Draped in the Penfolds flag perhaps (excuse the Australia day hangover). What it does smell like is rich and plummy Shiraz, in the most classic Australian sense.
Beyond the nose, beyond the ‘statement’ nose and it’s actually a bit wound up in that oak, the oak particulary noticeable after a quick foray back into the Vat 1. Still it looks quite balanced. Balanced in an Australian Shiraz sense, with a plushness of texture, a very dry palate, firmish tannins and a twang of acidity to finish, all of which adds up to an Aussie red wine drinkers wet dream.
Is is my wet dream? No, but certainly a benchmark wine which other Shiraz is measured by. A benchmark wine that is satisfyingly modest (all things considered) savoury and regional enough in many ways, whilst at the same time being unmistakeably brash and overt on occasion. A benchmark wine that I was sad to see empty. 18.5/94
Help keep this site paywall free – donate here


5 Comments
Great note Andrew. It captures a lot of what I also feel about Magill Estate. We drank a '99 from the cellar a couple of weeks ago. Not disimilar to your '04 – sadly only one left. I bought some '05, but never say '04 around.
Unfortunate that it's not getting to retail any more – supposedly. I would have liked some '06 being a wedding year and all.
MichaelC
Didn't see any 04 either. I imagine the 06 would have been quite enjoyable given the 06 St Henri too.
I don't understand Andrew, you said you "didn't see any '04 either", but you reviewed that wine, and it says that "cellar" was the source.
Was this from a friend's cellar?
MichaelC
Correct – sadly not my cellar. Came out of the boss' cellar actually.
On the topic I saw plenty of 04 Grange, St Henri et al. when they were released but no Magill. I do wonder how much they make of it these days….
Flipping between a 2004 Magill Estate and a Vat 1 – darn good drinking! What year the Vat 1? I have about 20 bottles of the 2004 Magill Estate left (only had one so far), so thank God it lasts a long time! Nice blog post!