Reschke Bull Trader Shiraz 2006

Reschke Bull Trader Shiraz 2006 (Coonawarra, SA)
$19, Screwcap, 14%
Source: Retail

http://www.reschke.com.au/

Firstly, an advanced apology: This is another lukewarm wine review, so tune out now if you are looking for a wine recommendation. Or buy a bottle of the Kurtz Boundary Row GSM 2006, which has been disappearing at alarming speeds whenever a bottle is opened around here. Now that is a cracking bottle of red wine for the dollars (I’ll review it down the track).

Anyway, back to this Shiraz. Now I have a suitably middling relationship with Coonawarra Shiraz, as, in my opinion, it is best suited to blending with a healthy dose of Coonawarra Cabernet. In fact, I think that Coonawarra Cabernet Shiraz is twice as interesting as Coonawarra Cabernet Merlot, though few people seem to agree (they obviously haven’t tried a full vertical of Petaluma Coonawarra).

As a result, I often find myself underwhelmed by Coonawarra Shiraz, and sadly this is no exception.
Mid red with light edges, the nose shows rather developed, secondary characters of pepper and roast beef with mushrooms, casserole like even, which makes it more interesting perhaps, but in the final wash there is little fruit in there.

Following this, the palate is somewhat dried out and tiring, showing liqueured and cedary secondary flavours and little generosity, with pokey acids and chewy tannins. The fruit is on the decline, yet the structure is rather decent, leaving not enough generosity to hang everything on. The end result is somewhat regional and mature, complex at times even, but ultimately just lacking the requisite vibrancy.  15/83

Andrew Graham Avatar

Andrew Graham was once voted the 23rd most trusted wine critic on the planet. A WCA Journalism Young Gun now old hack with 25yrs as a buyer, judge, journalist, marketer and too much more.

5 responses to “Reschke Bull Trader Shiraz 2006”

  1. I must admit Andrew to also being also consistently underwhelmed by Coonawarra Shiraz. I'm not sure I can put my finger on it – it's generally as you say. Perhaps sometimes it's not one thing or the other (I prefer very warm/hot climate or genuinely cool climate Shiraz). I can't recall having one that's really, really excited me. Some very good wines here and there, but it's an under-represented (or is that appropriately represented?) style of wine in my cellar. I did buy 2 Wynn's Michael '05 without tasting, so they will be the litmus test in several years time.

    MichaelC

    PS I don't mind reading about the not-so-good wines – it's all part of a building a more rounded and fully nuanced understanding of things.

  2. Do enjoy the Wynns Michael and have a vintage or two in the cellar, however given the choice I would always take it's sibling JR every time….

  3. I had a '98 Michael recently (or last year). FAR too oak-driven. Had to pull the splinters out of my lips. I have one left – also cellared without tasting first. I thought it would be clever to open on my birthday. Ha Ha. I wonder how many Michaels have bought the wine for this reason!

    Yes, JR would be my usual choice too. Unfortnately not called "John" or "Riddoch". Keep up the good work.

    MichaelC

  4. I'd love to see more GSM wines reviewed.

  5. GSM's – tick, will cover a few this weekend.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Australian Wine and Drinks Review

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading