Salon 1996

Salon 1996 (Champagne, France)
12%, Cork, $700
Source: A gift glass

I’ve been watching the tweets from the Len Evans tutorial this week (hashtag #LET12), lingering enviously over the pictures of epic, occasionally almost mythical, wines from both Australia and abroad. Why just the other night a 65 Lindemans Hunter River Burgundy made an appearance, one of those wines that is listed amongst the ‘greatest Australian wines ever made’ and is on my ‘must try before I die’ list.

Next year will be my Len Evans tutorial year, surely…

Anyways, this Salon, whilst still a recent release, may one day be considered amongst the greatest Champagnes ever made. Or at least that is what the hype around this wine suggests. Happily, I think the hype might be right too…

Now I can’t claim the credit for this bottle for it was donated by my colleague Angus Hughson. Angus promised to open it us when he passed at least some of his MW exams you see and he negotiated the ‘theory’ section successfully this year and duly popped the cork on this puppy. Thanks again and congratulations Angus.

What sets this wine apart is just how vinous it is. That may seem like an odd thing to say for Champagne, particularly given how much levity is given to the winemaking craft, instead of the grapes themselves, in Champagne production, yet this actually smells like grapes. It smells like Chardonnay grapes, that classic ‘white flower and brioche’ nose of long lees aged Chardonnay based Champagne. Outstanding nose, perfect even.

That perfection is a bit  disarming actually, the fragrance showing underlying latent power as well as layers of whipped cream richness (with a little hint of custard) and then more grapey power. I really didn’t expect it to be this pastry-meets-cream meets-acidity-and-they-have-a-beautiful-threesome perfect on the palate either, a wine that is both soft and powerful, the acidity forceful yet entirely balanced and natural. It’s vinous in its acidity again too, grapey even but with yeasty richness. So many layers. Sublime Champagne. Sublime. Yes!

Drink: 2012-2026+
Score: 19.2/20 97/100
Would I buy it? Someone lend me $700 and I would

Andrew Graham Avatar

Andrew Graham was once voted the 23rd most trusted wine critic on the planet. A WCA Journalism Young Gun now old hack with 25yrs as a buyer, judge, journalist, marketer and too much more.

6 responses to “Salon 1996”

  1. So Andrew…..where do I meet this Angus Hughson ??

    CR

  2. Just look for him lingering around tastings!

  3. Had the 96 Salon twice, when it was a pup. Potential unlimited, best young Champagne I have ever tried.

    Tracking well, I see!

  4. Like you've just stepped out of the salon!

    MichaelC

    1. 'Salon selectives' 🙂

      I was so keen to work a reference in there. Next time gadget 🙂

  5. I guess you had that Salon glow after drinking it.

    MichaelC

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Australian Wine and Drinks Review

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading