Tyrrell’s Vat 1 Semillon 2005 (Hunter Valley, NSW)
11.2%, Screwcap, $45
Source: Cellar
www.tyrrells.com.au
Glad to have a few more of these 05 Vat 1 Sems in the cellar – about as good as Hunter Valley Sem gets.
The 2005 Tyrrell’s Vat 1 Semillon is a blend of the Short Flat vineyard (planted in 1927 and located across the road from the Tyrrell’s winery) and the Johhno’s vineyard (planted circa 1908). As is the norm for Vat 1, the fruit was handpicked, crushed and then fermented cool, spending a short time on gross lees before racking to tank for 5 months before bottling.
It’s an unquestionably ripe Vat 1 too, from a warm year known more for powerful reds than classic Semillon. Yet that season ultimately just translates into a more powerful Semillon – and a satisfying one at that. I had it next to a 2008 Billaud-Simon Montee de Tonnerre 1er Cru Chablis and it blew the Chablis out of the water in both structure, drinkability and pure exuberance. The Vat 1 is only 2/3rds of the Chablis price to boot.
Help keep Australian Wine and Drinks Review free
Rather than bombard you with ads or erect a paywall, I simply ask for a donation to keep this site running.
Donate here and help produce more brutally honest drinks reviews
Rich bottle development, sour acid and no shortage of concentration – it’s a wonderful combo really, the clean, sublime and lengthy finish the very icing on the cake.
Bloody great.
Drink: 2013-2030
Score: 18.8/20 96/100
Would I buy it? I want more.
4 Comments
Andrew, I like 2005 for Hunter Semillon. Perhaps I like 2004 more, but 2005 has a ribald textural quality that I enjoy. HVD and Belford also extremely good from 2005.
MichaelC
So do I. Tyrrell's in particular. I don't mind the classic form of 06 for that matter. Will probably live longer than some of the 05s
Agree Andrew. 2006 is a wedding year, so I went long on Hunter Semillon, but it's not my absolute favourite recent vintage. Too 'classic' for my taste? Will be very long lived though, although the Vat 1 is quite a big wine from a couple of tastings.
MichaelC
It's such a wine-by-wine basis for the 06 vs 05 proposition. Maybe I'm a classicist, but I like the classic lines of 06 more and more…