I could almost phone in the review for this St Hugo 2015 duo. Oaky reds with warm alcohol, no shortage of (added) acidity and plenty of tannins.
Job done, let’s go to the pub (and drink IPA).
But what I want to know is whether you covet wines like this duo. The Cab will improve for decades, but I wonder whether the minty, old-school Coonawarra Cab lines are really attractive in a ‘medium-bodied is the way forward’ modern world.
So would you buy ’em?
6 Comments
I’m a new-ish wine collector – have only been serious for the last 6 or so years and this is a world away from what I normally buy. I sometimes get exposed to older versions of these wines with friends and it makes me wonder why and how these styles became so popular back in the day. They just aren’t that enjoyable to drink. Give me a Mayford Shiraz any day 😉
Me too.
Its a very interesting question you pose. For me you touch on it in the review of the Shiraz – balance. A wine without balance whether lighter in style or heavier is never going to be good. But I enjoy each style at different times depending on my food, company or mood of the day.
At $55 I would not buy either of them since there are plenty of other wines I would spend my money on. However I do own a bottle of the 1997 St Hugo Cabernet. I’ve no idea what style it was made in but with it being from a less fancied vintage I hope to be surprised. It was a gift from Christmas 2000 in Sydney.
It’s funny I don’t notice the alcohol warmth in these wines especially in the Cabernet. And the tannins are fine as long as they are in balance. I actually enjoy the grip of the tannin.
I’d like to have a revisit of these Rod – imagine the tannins are much better integrated two years down the track.